three AI reads at a time

Tag

youtube

2 reads

YouTube (Corey Gallon, Rexmore) 2026-10-14-1

I Believe Everything My Agents Tell Me: Three Levels of Review — Corey Gallon, Rexmore

Gallon's agent produced a letter whose numbers were right to the cent and whose premise was wrong, which is exactly the failure reconciliation can't see. Only the role-based cold reviewers attacked the frame; the invoice check would have passed it. In about 4 in 10 analysed 2026 sessions an agent got something wrong that mattered, so self-reported completion plus a spot-check is no longer a defensible default, and verification effort will have to scale with stakes.

# tags
verification-infrastructureverifier-bottleneckagent-evaluationself-grading-agentsmaker-checkerclosed-loop-verificationagent-orchestrationai-engineeringai-practitioneryoutubevideo
→ threads
verification-infrastructureverifier-bottleneckagent-orchestration
⟷ links
2026-05-01-w32026-04-30-32026-05-22-w22026-05-07-22026-04-05-12026-05-10-32026-05-06-32026-05-06-1
permalink
AI Engineer (YouTube) 2026-10-14-2

The Death of the Code Review: What the Data Actually Says — Laurie Voss, Arize AI

Review isn't disappearing; the unit of human review is moving from the diff to the definition of good. Every no-human showcase, from OpenAI's roughly 1M lines and 1,500 merged PRs with three engineers to Bun's 6-day Rust port, had humans authoring the verifier, and the Bun port still carries 13,044 unsafe blocks against about 74 in comparable human code. Whoever codifies mergeability into rubrics and evals sets what agents treat as done.

# tags
verifier-bottleneckcode-reviewai-engineerai-coding-toolsagentic-engineeringhuman-in-the-looparizeverification-infrastructureloop-engineeringyoutube
→ threads
verifier-bottleneckverification-infrastructure
⟷ links
2026-04-05-12026-05-22-32026-04-07-22026-04-07-12026-03-21-22026-04-22-22026-04-10-w22026-05-01-w32026-05-07-2
permalink